qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] softmmu: add helper function to pass thr


From: Pavel Dovgaluk
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] softmmu: add helper function to pass through retaddr
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:17:29 +0300

> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:address@hidden
> On 17/06/2015 14:42, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
> > This patch introduces several helpers to pass return address
> > which points to the TB. Correct return address allows correct
> > restoring of the guest PC and icount. These functions should be used when
> > helpers embedded into TB invoke memory operations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Dovgalyuk <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  include/exec/cpu_ldst_template.h |   42 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  include/exec/exec-all.h          |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  softmmu_template.h               |   18 ++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/exec/cpu_ldst_template.h 
> > b/include/exec/cpu_ldst_template.h
> > index 95ab750..1847816 100644
> > --- a/include/exec/cpu_ldst_template.h
> > +++ b/include/exec/cpu_ldst_template.h
> > @@ -62,7 +62,9 @@
> >  /* generic load/store macros */
> >
> >  static inline RES_TYPE
> > -glue(glue(cpu_ld, USUFFIX), MEMSUFFIX)(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong ptr)
> > +glue(glue(glue(cpu_ld, USUFFIX), MEMSUFFIX), _ra)(CPUArchState *env,
> > +                                                  target_ulong ptr,
> > +                                                  uintptr_t retaddr)
> 
> Would it make sense to call these helper_cpu_ld##USUFFIX##MEMSUFFIX?

I don't want to use 'helper' prefix, because helper functions are
usually called directly from TB.

Pavel Dovgalyuk




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]