[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/29] Include hw/irq.h a lot less
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/29] Include hw/irq.h a lot less |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:06:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 |
On 8/7/19 8:04 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 8/6/19 5:14 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/irq.h triggers a recompile
>> of some 5400 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and objects that
>> don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
>>
>> hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience. Several other headers
>> include it just to get qemu_irq and.or qemu_irq_handler.
>>
>> Move the qemu_irq and qemu_irq_handler typedefs from hw/irq.h to
>> qemu/typedefs.h, and then include hw/irq.h only where it's still
>> needed. Touching it now recompiles only some 500 objects.
>>
>> /*
>> * Function types
>> */
>> typedef void SaveStateHandler(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque);
>> typedef int LoadStateHandler(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id);
>> +typedef void (*qemu_irq_handler)(void *opaque, int n, int level);
Should we prefer a consistent form for function pointer typedefs? Here,
we've mixed 'rettype Name(params)' with 'rettype (*name)(params)'.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Is network backend netmap worth keeping?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Is network backend netmap worth keeping?, Vincenzo Maffione, 2019/08/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Is network backend netmap worth keeping? (was: [PATCH v2 27/29] Include sysemu/sysemu.h a lot less), Stefano Garzarella, 2019/08/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Is network backend netmap worth keeping?, Giuseppe Lettieri, 2019/08/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Is network backend netmap worth keeping?, Markus Armbruster, 2019/08/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Is network backend netmap worth keeping?, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/08/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Is network backend netmap worth keeping?, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/08/12
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 19/29] Include qemu/queue.h slightly less, Markus Armbruster, 2019/08/06
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/29] Include hw/irq.h a lot less, Markus Armbruster, 2019/08/06
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 29/29] sysemu: Split sysemu/runstate.h off sysemu/sysemu.h, Markus Armbruster, 2019/08/06
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 15/29] Include migration/vmstate.h less, Markus Armbruster, 2019/08/06
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 18/29] Include hw/hw.h exactly where needed, Markus Armbruster, 2019/08/06