qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Honor HCR_EL2.TID3 trapping requirements


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Honor HCR_EL2.TID3 trapping requirements
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 21:04:16 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 11/23/19 11:56 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> HCR_EL2.TID3 mandates that access from EL1 to a long list of id
> registers traps to EL2, and QEMU has so far ignored this requirement.
> 
> This breaks (among other things) KVM guests that have PtrAuth enabled,
> while the hypervisor doesn't want to expose the feature to its guest.
> To achieve this, KVM traps the ID registers (ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1 in this
> case), and masks out the unsupported feature.
> 
> QEMU not honoring the trap request means that the guest observes
> that the feature is present in the HW, starts using it, and dies
> a horrible death when KVM injects an UNDEF, because the feature
> *really* isn't supported.
> 
> Do the right thing by trapping to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TID3 is set.
> 
> Reported-by: Will Deacon <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <address@hidden>
> ---
> There is a number of other trap bits missing (TID[0-2], for example),
> but this at least gets a mainline Linux going with cpu=max.

BTW, Peter, this appears to have been the bug that was causing me so many
problems on my VHE branch.  Probably *exactly* this bug wrt ptrauth, since that
would also be included with -cpu max.

I am now able to boot a kvm guest kernel to the point of the no rootfs panic,
which I wasn't before.

I can only think that I mis-identified the true cause in Lyon.

Anyway, thanks Marc!


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]