[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:29:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 |
On 04/12/2019 14.28, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.12.2019 um 09:17 hat Gerd Hoffmann geschrieben:
>> Hi,
>>
>>>> | ...
>>>> +- qemu-edid
>>>
>>> Has its own MAINTAINERS section, together with hw/display/edit* and
>>> include/hw/display/edid.h. I'm not sure moving it hw/display/ is a good
>>> idea. Gerd?
>>
>> Sort-of makes sense. My personal preference would be a tools/ directory
>> for all those small utilities though.
>
> I think I would like that better than throwing tools into block/ where
> currently mostly just block drivers live.
+1 for tools/
Thomas
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, (continued)
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Peter Maydell, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/03
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Markus Armbruster, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Gerd Hoffmann, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Kevin Wolf, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?,
Thomas Huth <=
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Eric Blake, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Markus Armbruster, 2019/12/04
- Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Eric Blake, 2019/12/04
Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Christophe de Dinechin, 2019/12/02
Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/12/03