|
From: | Eric Blake |
Subject: | Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? |
Date: | Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:36:12 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 12/4/19 7:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 04.12.2019 um 09:17 hat Gerd Hoffmann geschrieben:Hi,| ... +- qemu-edidHas its own MAINTAINERS section, together with hw/display/edit* and include/hw/display/edid.h. I'm not sure moving it hw/display/ is a good idea. Gerd?Sort-of makes sense. My personal preference would be a tools/ directory for all those small utilities though.I think I would like that better than throwing tools into block/ where currently mostly just block drivers live.
Ooh, I should have read this sub-thread before writing my reply at the top level. Yes, I like the idea of tools/ for qemu-img, qemu-io, and qemu-nbd better than block/.
Or, if we want to move the tools there, we'd need another directory level inside block/ to keep things reasonably organised.
Separating drivers from executables sounds worthwhile either way, whether that division is by a new tools/ or by a subdirectory in block/.
-- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |