Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live?

[Peter Maydell]

On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 10:53, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> We seem to be coming to the conclusion something that:
>
>   a) It should live in the qemu tree
>   b) It shouldn't live under contrib
>   c) We'll create a new top level, i.e. 'daemons'
>   d) virtiofsd will be daemons/virtiofsd
>
> Now, somethings I'm less clear on:
>   e) What else would move into daemons?  It was suggested
>     that if we've got virtiofsd in there, then we should move
>     libvhost-user - which I understand, but then it's not a
>     'daemons'.
>     Are there any otehr daemons that should move?

I like the idea of a new top level directory, but I think
'daemons' is a bit too specific -- for instance it seems to
me that qemu-img would be sensible to move out of the root,
and that's not a daemon.

thanks
-- PMM