qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 15/63] i8259: Rename TYPE_I8259 to TYPE_PIC


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/63] i8259: Rename TYPE_I8259 to TYPE_PIC
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 17:45:18 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11)

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:19:46PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 9/3/20 12:42 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > This will make the type name constant consistent with the name of
> > > the type checking macro.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > > ---
> > >  hw/intc/i8259.c | 10 +++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c
> > > index 344fd04db1..e536cc90be 100644
> > > --- a/hw/intc/i8259.c
> > > +++ b/hw/intc/i8259.c
> > > @@ -37,10 +37,10 @@
> > >  
> > >  //#define DEBUG_IRQ_LATENCY
> > >  
> > > -#define TYPE_I8259 "isa-i8259"
> > > +#define TYPE_PIC "isa-i8259"
> > 
> > I disagree with this patch, as we have various PIC and only one I8259.
> 
> Like in the I8254 case, I agree with your point.  I will suggest
> renaming the PIC macro to I8259 instead.

I'd suggest it should be TYPE_ISA_I8259  to match the object type name
string.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]