qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/i386: Add FEAT_7_1_EDX to adjust feature level


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/i386: Add FEAT_7_1_EDX to adjust feature level
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 10:28:00 +0200

On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:27:19 +0800
Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:23:05 +0800
> > Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Considering the case of FEAT_7_1_EAX being 0 and FEAT_7_1_EDX being
> > > non-zero,  
> > Can you clarify when/why that happens?  
> 
> When start a VM on GraniteRapids using '-cpu host', we can see two leafs 
> CPUID_7_0
> and CPUID_7_1 in VM, because both CPUID_7_1_EAX and CPUID_7_1_EDX have 
> non-zero value:
> 0x00000007 0x01: eax=0x00201c30 edx=0x00004000
> 
> But if we minus all FEAT_7_1_EAX features using
> '-cpu host,-avx-vnni,-avx512-bf16,-fzrm,-fsrs,-fsrc,-amx-fp16', we can't get 
> CPUID_7_1
> leaf even though CPUID_7_1_EDX has non-zero value, so it is necessary to 
> update
> cpuid_level_func7 by CPUID_7_1_EDX.

Pls, explain that in commit message.
 
> Thanks,
> Tao
> 
> >   
> > > guest may report wrong maximum number sub-leaves in leaf
> > > 07H. So add FEAT_7_1_EDX to adjust feature level.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: eaaa197d5b11 ("target/i386: Add support for AVX-VNNI-INT8 in CPUID
> > > enumeration")
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tao Su <tao1.su@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  target/i386/cpu.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > index 1242bd541a..e8a70c35d2 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > @@ -6778,6 +6778,7 @@ void x86_cpu_expand_features(X86CPU *cpu, Error 
> > > **errp)
> > >          x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_6_EAX);
> > >          x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_0_ECX);
> > >          x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_1_EAX);
> > > +        x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_7_1_EDX);
> > >          x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0001_EDX);
> > >          x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0001_ECX);
> > >          x86_cpu_adjust_feat_level(cpu, FEAT_8000_0007_EDX);  
> > 
> >   
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]