repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org


From: Richard Stallman
Subject: Re: (re-)evaluation of notabug.org
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:47:49 -0400

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > PASS - C5 - Recommends GPLv3-or-later
  >        it has been previously determined on this mailing list, that
  >        this requirement does not apply to most forges - most forges do
  >        not recommend _any_ licenses - they simply offer (optionally) to
  >        install a license file, from a pre-defined set,

This seems to be a miscommunication.  GitHub does recommend licenses.
It offers a list of licenses when you start a project, and says good
and bad things about them.

Do we need to clarify the description of C5?

  > ???? - A3 - Offers AGPLv3-or-later
  >        for the reason described in C5, no forge does this (not even
  >        savannah)

Is that a similar miscommunication?
Do we need to clarify the description of A3?
-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]