Re: [security-discuss] GFDL holds the answer about fancy javascript

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 03/03/2017 00:34, Anonymous wrote:
> If it's the cosmetics of fancy javascript frills vs. being functional,
> then the answer as to which wins that contest in the GFDL:
> 
>   https://static.fsf.org/nosvn/directory/fdl-1.3-standalone.html
> 
> (search for "simple html")

Please read the license fully.

Simple HTML is only required if you want to make a "transparent copy"
(which is basically GFDLese for source code).  The GNU radio website can
be handled as an opaque copy, while the transparent copy is in the
source repository.

Paolo