I feel that if you continue to call it simulavrxx, it will just make it
more confusing to users as to what it is.
I would like to propose that you call it simulavr, but with a different
version number please. I understand that the internals are vastly different.
- please don't. simulavrxx (or whatever one chooses to name it) should not
be implied to the most current release of simulavr, implying that the C
based simulavr is dead, as there are definite advantages to having a plain
old C based simulator, which doesn't require C++ to build, thereby possibly
allowing it to be more easily integrated with/into other tools