sks-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] [GnuPG-users] sks-keyservers.net: Changes to pools / SRV


From: Kristian Fiskerstrand
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] [GnuPG-users] sks-keyservers.net: Changes to pools / SRV Weights
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 13:58:10 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2012-05-13 07:48, Gabor Kiss wrote:
> Dear Kristian,
> 
>> 
> 
>> [1] http://sks-keyservers.net/status/
> 
> This is quite strange. On April 30 there were 92 servers in the
> pool. Today your status page shows 47 only.
> 

Hi Gabor,

I haven't looked into this too closely, but a few changes as of late
that can be relevant. (btw, I'm seeing 65 here)

 * Excluding servers version 1.0.10 and before

 * The change to use hostname reported in status page as basis, which
removed quite a few duplicates, and two -- three keyservers removed
due to lack of FQDN in that hostname.

 * Using a dynamic inclusion criteria based on stddev of the servers

 * Updating the pool more frequently, it now updates every two hours
(why is it relevant that it is updating more frequently? Since SKS
version 1.1.2 the statistics calculation can be updated more
frequently by using "pkill -USR2 sks || exit 1" in e.g. a crontab.
Which means that servers not doing this at times will lag behind in
keys and be excluded -- you'll notice that this changes throughout the
day, the further away from the regular scheduled statistics update of
the older versions)

In addition it seems that a few keyservers that used to be in the pool
are lagging in keys. (Ptree corruptions?)

But in the end , whether it is 45, 65 or 105 I don't necessarily care,
as long as there are enough to provide good results to the pool.


- -- 
- ----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
http://www.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
- ----------------------------
Corruptissima re publica plurimæ leges
The greater the degeneration of the republic, the more of its laws
- ----------------------------
This email was digitally signed using the OpenPGP
standard. If you want to read more about this
The book: Sending Emails - The Safe Way: An
introduction to OpenPGP security is now
available in both Amazon Kindle and Paperback
format at
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B006RSG1S4/
- ----------------------------
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at http://www.sumptuouscapital.com/pgp/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=Fl4Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]