sks-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool


From: Phil Pennock
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Min. Requirement for SKS Version in the Pool
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:20:50 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On 2012-06-25 at 15:38 +0100, Andy Ruddock wrote:
> If the version number requirements for being in the keyserver pool is
> greater than that provided in the repositories then the package may just
> as well not be in the repositories at all.

No, you can run a keyserver for local use without running it for
external usage.

Everyone's free to make their own choice about which version they run,
who they peer with, etc.  Everyone is free to run a keyserver pool
definition in DNS, it's just that at present there's one main pool which
folks generally tend to use.

If your local policy says "more important to be in stable branch of OS
repository system", but the keyserver pool operator has a policy of
"more important to not be broken for use-cases X,Y,Z", then that's fine.
Your server doesn't get listed in that particular pool.  Don't sweat it.

There is no central command and control.  We just all mostly get along,
most of the time.

- -Phil
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk/qNbgACgkQQDBDFTkDY3/b7wCeNioQA9f2ajxfcOPWDAbPNKWv
IMAAnjcL4utcObEhKWeg8nA/iak4YMWp
=+cye
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]