Re: [Social-discuss] Which of these names do you like?

[Matt Lee]

On 06/18/2010 12:15 PM, Sean Corbett wrote:
> I think the intention is that these will just be some base instances 
> of GNU Social to provide a foundation of servers to work with, not 
> the entire social network per se (in the same way that identi.ca 
> isn't the only StatusNet server). We wouldn't require people to use 
> names from this list.. We still expect (and encourage) people to 
> install their own instances of GNU Social once the alpha/subsequent 
> versions are released.

but this list is crucial too -- having a serious list of dozens of
servers will prevent everyone, even those who don't want to run their
own servers, from using the same server, which is something we'd like to
avoid.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature