Re: [STUMP] Some patches to remove implementation-dependent code

[Vladimir Sedach]

> [0] Actually, given that portable-clx is pretty much maintainerless
>    I've even considered having a 'blessed' version that we maintain
>    specifically for stumpwm.

I think this is where the problem is. Do you want to try being
co-maintainer with me? clx is something I was eventually planning to
work on anyway.

Vladimir