Re: [STUMP] Contrib

[David Bjergaard]

I would also like to chime in with support for a separate wiki
documenting add-ons. I ended up re-implementing functionality in some of
them before realizing a solution existed.  There is also very little
*visible* documentation of whats in contrib, unless you see it
referenced in a stumpwmrc, or in IRC.

Something like emacsWiki would be an absolute boon to StumpWM in my
opinion.

        Dave

Lucas Pandolfo <address@hidden> writes:

> On 19 November 2011 14:33, Ben Spencer <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>     What if instead we had a database of stumpwm add-ons that were
>     hosted
>     elsewhere?  This could be something as simple as a wiki page or a
>     full-blown system with reviews, comments etc if anybody cared to
>     make
>     it.
>     
>     The authors of the add-ons could maintain their software in their
>     own
>     repos (including non-git repos if they have some strange aversion
>     to
>     git), and users could keep it up to date from there.  The packages
>     could use asdf to make it convenient to load them from stumpwmrc.
>     
>     
>
> I like the idea.
> Something like the scripts section in the sawfish wiki
> (http://sawfish.wikia.com/wiki/Scripts).
> Or maybe something like box-look.org
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel