[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] What are the Common Lisp implementations which StumpWM suppo
|
From: |
Ben Spencer |
|
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] What are the Common Lisp implementations which StumpWM supports? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:54:45 +0000 |
On 15 January 2015 at 17:41, David Bjergaard <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> away with and replaced with compatibility libraries from quicklisp.
> This probably won't happen mainly to avoid making headaches for package
> maintainers.
Well you don't *have* to get them from quicklisp, it's just the
easiest way for an end user building from source to deal with a bunch
of dependencies. I would have thought this was less of a problem for
package maintainers in that you just need to define the list once, but
I'm not a package maintainer so I won't press the point.
Ben