[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] What are the Common Lisp implementations which StumpWM suppo
|
From: |
Diogo F. S. Ramos |
|
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] What are the Common Lisp implementations which StumpWM supports? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:08:05 -0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
> On 15 January 2015 at 17:41, David Bjergaard <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> away with and replaced with compatibility libraries from quicklisp.
>> This probably won't happen mainly to avoid making headaches for package
>> maintainers.
>
> Well you don't *have* to get them from quicklisp, it's just the
> easiest way for an end user building from source to deal with a bunch
> of dependencies. I would have thought this was less of a problem for
> package maintainers in that you just need to define the list once, but
> I'm not a package maintainer so I won't press the point.
Well, packages need to be available in the repository. Not only
packages and their dependencies, but also the correct versions of them.