[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [swarm-hackers] bye bye CVS?
From: |
Bill Northcott |
Subject: |
Re: [swarm-hackers] bye bye CVS? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:10:29 +1000 |
It makes sense to me to move to svn.
Git is another can of worms altogether. I think we would need a
significantly larger community for that sort of fragmentation to make
much sense.
My two pennyworth
Bill
On 27/09/2008, at 6:46 AM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:
Hmm, for encouraging development (assuming that learning the
revision control system was a minor cost, which I think it is not
here), then in principle it would be better to have many independent
fronts of development as in git or Mercurial than a centralized
system. For example, looking at the Linux kernel git repository (http://git.linux.org
, there's a sense of ownership that seems good to encourage. On the
other hand, if converting over to svn is easy on savannah, that's a
good solid improvement.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature