[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A whiff of reality...
From: |
Gary Polhill |
Subject: |
Re: A whiff of reality... |
Date: |
Tue, 02 May 2000 18:26:47 +0100 |
Doug Donalson wrote:
>
> Here is a reference I ran across when writing the final chapter of my
> dissertation.
>
> Rykiel, E.J., 1996. Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation.
> Ecol. Model. 90, 229-244.
>
> Although the it is about "validation", at least it's a whack at applying a
> structure to one of these problems. I have had several (actually, many more
> than several) arguments with my advisor and other committee members about
> including "verification" procedures in at least in a paper appendix. The
> general feeling is that this would be like experimentalists including
> details of instrument calibration procedures. (Ecologists make Joe Friday
> look like a light weight with "Just the facts, ma'am". Nothing but that
> which is essential for the development of the idea in the paper should be
> included, and model testing, at this point is considered a distraction.) I
> personally don't agree until we have verification methods as well
> delinieated as those for experimental instruments. (Of course, in all
> cases, you still have to apply the methods.)
>
Just to add my tuppence-ha'penny's worth (English for two cents), there is
an interesting paper about validation and verification by Naomi Oreskes and
others in Science vol.263 (1994) pp 641-646. They argue that except in a
closed system, validation of models is not possible, since you are committing
the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent:
Assume: If any model is valid, then it will predict the data
Assume: My model predicts the data
Conclude: My model is valid
Gary
--
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen. AB15 8QH
Tel: +44 (0) 1224 318611 Email: address@hidden
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: A whiff of reality..., (continued)
Re: A whiff of reality..., M. Lang & S. Railsback, 2000/05/01
Re: A whiff of reality...,
Gary Polhill <=
Re: A whiff of reality..., glen e. p. ropella, 2000/05/02
Re: A whiff of reality..., Jan Kreft, 2000/05/03
Re: A whiff of reality..., glen e. p. ropella, 2000/05/03
Re: A whiff of reality..., Gary Polhill, 2000/05/03
Re: A whiff of reality..., glen e. p. ropella, 2000/05/03
Re: A whiff of reality..., Darren Schreiber, 2000/05/02
Re: A whiff of reality..., Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/05/01
Re: A whiff of reality..., Robert, 2000/05/01
Re: A whiff of reality..., Darren Schreiber, 2000/05/02