Re: [Swarm-Modelling] GEPR on life-cycle requirements

[Marcus G. Daniels]

Daniel Calhoun wrote:
> It actually hints at producing emergent species that are not 
> encompassed by (that is, in the ugly word, "built in by") a naive 
> pre-specification of the outcome. 
What I would hope to see is a facility whereby phylogenetic changes 
could occur gradually in a population made up of mutable genotypes 
(mutable data), not just abruptly due to unrealistic biases the modeler 
may be nudged into using purely for implementation convenience.  (The 
latter is what Swarm has now with its `phases'.)

Marcus