[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Taler] transaction state/history; fulfillment
|
From: |
Florian Dold |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Taler] transaction state/history; fulfillment |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jan 2016 19:26:22 +0100 |
On Jan 8, 2016 18:29, "Sree Harsha Totakura" <address@hidden> wrote:
> The web docs need to be fixed. They still list HTTP 301.
You're right!
> Customer paid the merchant. Now, what if the merchant were not to give
> this fulfillment signature?
My point is that in this case the customer can *immediately* escalate this, the customer immediately knows something went wrong.
- Florian
- [Taler] Taler roll out, (continued)
- [Taler] Taler roll out, Klaus Schleisiek, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] Taler roll out, Christian Grothoff, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] Taler roll out, Hartmut Goebel, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] Taler roll out, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] Taler roll out, Klaus Schleisiek, 2016/01/10
- Re: [Taler] Taler roll out, Christian Grothoff, 2016/01/10
- Re: [Taler] Taler roll out, nana karlstetter, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] transaction state/history; fulfillment, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] transaction state/history; fulfillment, Florian Dold, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] transaction state/history; fulfillment, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2016/01/08
- Re: [Taler] transaction state/history; fulfillment,
Florian Dold <=