[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS
From: |
Hanzac Chen |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:33:50 +0800 |
On 7/13/05, Felix Nawothnig wrote:
> Hanzac Chen wrote:
> > Besides, that also need to be embedded a 16-bit stub from DJGPP. Then
> > it could be a valid coff-go32 executable.
>
> Isn't this the job of the linker?
Yes, you're right. I am thinking that LCC has also some linking ability.
On 7/13/05, Felix Nawothnig wrote:
> Paul Furber wrote:
> > http://dosbox.sourceforge.net is pretty impressive - good enough to run
> > Win 3.1 and lots of games and demos from my youth :)
>
> There is just one x86 emulator (called qemu) and DOS is one of it's
> supported guest OSes ... (come on, advertising dosbox here just asked
> for a comment like that :P)
Advertise ... QEMU+FreeDOS is faster than DOSBOX.
- [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, BUDI ARIEF GUSANDI, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, address@hidden, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Hanzac Chen, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Paul Furber, 2005/07/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS,
Hanzac Chen <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Piotr Skamruk, 2005/07/14
- Message not available
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Hanzac Chen, 2005/07/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Paul Furber, 2005/07/13
- Message not available
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Alan Grimes, 2005/07/12
- Message not available
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Hanzac Chen, 2005/07/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Tiny C for DOS, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/13