[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes
From: |
Sylvain BERTRAND |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:39:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
:)
If I were to design a new language, I would go the other way,
less complex, more explicit.
I would go for a kind of C99- language (C-- is already taken by a
great evil):
- only sized types (u8 s16 f80...), no void pointer
- kind of no implicit cast (use of aliasing)
- no typedef
- no enum
- one loop instruction (loop{} you would break or continue)
- arrays to behave like structs
- no bitfield
- a clean attribute management syntax
- no const/volatile/inline/static... that would be done using
the attribute
syntax
- clean inline asm.
...
--
Sylvain
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/21
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes,
Sylvain BERTRAND <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/23
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/23
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/25