[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought)
From: |
Christian Jullien |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought) |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:19:25 +0100 |
Woah! Basile, we said about the same things at the same time.
I of course fully agree with your post :o)
Christian
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Basile Starynkevitch
Sent: mercredi 28 octobre 2015 07:12
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for
thought)
On 10/28/2015 05:14 AM, Sergey Korshunoff wrote:
> Hi Basile
>
>> A C++ compiler needs to be optimizing. The C++ language specification
>> sort-of requires an > > optimizing compiler
> Did you say that a usual C compiler (gcc, clang) can not optimize as a C++
does?
> A tcc compiler is a compiler for a development speedup. A final stage
> can be build by the usual compiler.
No, I was just saying the obvious point that practically speaking the
C++11 standard is expecting any compiler implementing that standard to
optimize significantly. A C++ compiler should inline lots of functions
(including most member functions declared inside a class) and do a lot of
optimizations (in particular constant folding, some loop unrolling or if
(true) optimizations, dead code elimination, etc...). I giuess that some
template expansion cannot happen without optimizations.
Hence a trivial compiler like TinyC (which don't do any serious optimization
at all, this is why it compiles so fast) won't make sense in C++; you cannot
code a TinyC++ compiler (which would not have serious optimization passes)!
I do know that both GCC & Clang are optimizing a common internal
representation (e.g. Gimple in GCC) which is the same (or at least mostly
overlapping) for C or C++ source code.
Notice that GCC even with -O0 is doing *some* optimizations.
Cheers.
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la
Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mine, sont seulement les miennes} ***
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, u-tcc-uepj, 2015/10/23
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/25
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/25
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, u-tcc-uepj, 2015/10/26
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/26
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought), Basile Starynkevitch, 2015/10/26
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought), Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/28
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought), Basile Starynkevitch, 2015/10/28
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought),
Christian Jullien <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought), Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/28
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought), Christian Jullien, 2015/10/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought), Basile Starynkevitch, 2015/10/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C (food for thought), Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/29
Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, arnold, 2015/10/23
Re: [Tinycc-devel] modern c++ compiler written in C, Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/10/31