[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs"
From: |
Sergey Korshunoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs" |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Nov 2015 01:02:06 +0300 |
> However, how come the old code did not need to compare such two dirs, and
> still
> worked correctly? If the old code was working correctly without needing to
> compare
> two actual dirs, despite it not being "n[m]ormalized", maybe it's still the
> better
> solution because it depends less on features which are harder to use reliably
> on
> different platforms?
A correction for Windows will be in near feature. From cygwin gcc docs:
Windows does not natively support inodes, and neither does MSDOS.
Cygwin's emulation can generate non-unique inodes, so don't use it.
Solution will be the same: consider all dirs as different.
- [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Edmund Grimley Evans, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Roy Tam, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Roy Tam, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Christian Jullien, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Edmund Grimley Evans, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", avih, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Christian Jullien, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", avih, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs",
Sergey Korshunoff <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", avih, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", Sergey Korshunoff, 2015/11/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] "mormalize_inc_dirs", avih, 2015/11/07