Sorry, ... in the near future.
2015-11-08 1:02 GMT+03:00, Sergey Korshunoff <
address@hidden>:
>> However, how come the old code did not need to compare such two dirs, and
>> still
>> worked correctly? If the old code was working correctly without needing to
>> compare
>> two actual dirs, despite it not being "n[m]ormalized", maybe it's still
>> the better
>> solution because it depends less on features which are harder to use
>> reliably on
>> different platforms?
>
> A correction for Windows will be in near feature. >From cygwin gcc docs:
> Windows does not natively support inodes, and neither does MSDOS.
> Cygwin's emulation can generate non-unique inodes, so don't use it.
>
> Solution will be the same: consider all dirs as different.
>
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hiddenhttps://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel