Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian

[Josh Green]

On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:30 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
> Josh Green skrev:
> > Any suggestion on what licenses are most
> > appropriate for documentation?
> 
> That's seems to be a difficult question. I tried to do some research and
> currently it seems like Creative Commons Share-Alike v3.0 is the most
> bright shining star:
> 
> * It's accepted by Debian
> 
> * Wikipedia is planning to change to that license, and FSF has accepted
> that the license will be used as a successor to GFDL (at least for
> wikipedia?).
> 
> But I'm really not an expert on that subject.
> 
> // David
> 

Guess I was repeating the question in that previous email I wrote.  I
should read my email backwards ;)  I think CC SA 3.0 sounds good to me.

        Josh