Re: [fluid-dev] Supported Wave/Flac format other than SF2

[BCA @ Free-Artists]

OK, stop cursing.

Yes, you're right - that should be read as "96 kHz".

BR
Bernd.



Am 05.02.2015 um 13:22 schrieb Mattes:
>   
>
> For heaven´s sake - what for? That´s a dynamic range no human will ever be able
> to hear/use?
> Or did you just mix up bit-depth and (96khz) sampling rate?
>   
> Cheers, Ralf Mattes
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev