Re: Please test gub

[Urs Liska]

Hi Knut,

Am 29.01.19 um 10:02 schrieb Knut Petersen:
> Hi Urs!
>
> > So what can I do to check whether make lilypond succeeded or failed?
>
>
> The last lines of the terminal output will look like:
>
>     make -f lilypond.make update-versions
>
>     To upload, run:
>
>         make lilypond-upload LILYPOND_BRANCH=master
>     LILYPOND_REPO_URL=git://git.sv.gnu.org/lilypond.git
>
>     **** nsis rule
>     python bin/gub tools::nsis
>     calculating dependencies
>     Checking for iconv ... /usr/bin/iconv
>     Checking for g++ ... /usr/bin/g++
>     Checking for gcc ... /usr/bin/gcc
>     must rebuild[tools]: system::gcc system::g++ system::iconv
>      *** Stage: pkg_install (cross/gcc-core, linux-x86)
>       cross/gcc conflicts with cross/gcc-core
>         non-core cross/gcc already installed
>           skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
>       cross/gcc-doc conflicts with cross/gcc-core
>         non-core cross/gcc already installed
>           skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
>       cross/gcc-runtime conflicts with cross/gcc-core
>         non-core cross/gcc already installed
>           skipping request to install cross/gcc-core
>
>      *** Stage: pkg_install (glibc-core, linux-x86)
>       glibc conflicts with glibc-core
>         non-core glibc already installed
>           skipping request to install glibc-core
>       glibc-doc conflicts with glibc-core
>         non-core glibc already installed
>           skipping request to install glibc-core
>
>     done
>     **** rest rule
>     **** all rule
>     **** Default rule
>     make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/knut/sources/gub'
>
> if everything worked fine.

Indeed that's exactly how it looks like :-)


> In uploads you see the generated installers, the documentation, test 
> results etc:
>
>     drwxr-xr-x 2 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:56 signatures
>     drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:56 localdoc
>     drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:56 webdoc
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 137828875 29. Jan 08:56
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.webdoc.tar.bz2
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users 158089031 29. Jan 08:55
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.documentation.tar.bz2
>     drwxr-xr-x 4 knut users      4096 29. Jan 08:34 webtest
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  18416327 29. Jan 08:31
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.test-output.tar.bz2
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  17226394 29. Jan 08:28 lilypond-2.21.0.tar.gz
>     -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  31251820 29. Jan 08:27
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-64.sh
>     -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  28063129 29. Jan 08:27
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.freebsd-x86.sh
>     -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  30586997 29. Jan 08:27
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-ppc.sh
>     -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  31375293 29. Jan 08:27
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-64.sh
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  34665510 29. Jan 08:26
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.mingw.exe
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  26746205 29. Jan 08:25
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
>     -rw-r--r-- 1 knut users  26611149 29. Jan 08:25
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.darwin-ppc.tar.bz2
>     -rwxr-xr-x 1 knut users  31208955 29. Jan 08:24
>     lilypond-2.21.0-1.linux-x86.sh
>
> If you reached that point everything went fine.
>
> At least we hope that everything went fine.
>
> When we will start to update relevant components like guile we will 
> need a way to test if the generated archives contain a working 
> lilypond or garbage. I see that you already thought about that by 
> providing the generated files on your cloud. Thanks you.

Right now I have the process running on my dedicated server running 
Debian 9.7 (so far running without errors, but I'll reattach to the 
session in the afternoon). If that works too I'd "donate" that server 
capacity for further and maybe automated tests, as long as I don't have 
to be involved in complicated set-ups or configuration. If necessary I 
could then also give someone (e.g. you) a non-privileged user account. 
But I'll report back when I have results from the current build.

Urs

> Knut