[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why Lout? and how to with latin2
From: |
Ian Carr-de Avelon |
Subject: |
Why Lout? and how to with latin2 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:08:36 +0200 |
>What about latin2 in lout? Is latin2 fonts a must, or can I use
>latin1 fonts for typeseting in latin2? I want ask, is there some
>mechanism which can use latin1 and accents to typeset characters
>in latin2?
As Uwe wrote, the Czech is supposed to be there, due to the Czech
characters having been defined in terms of glyphs. It is a while
since I tried, but here bellow is as close as I got to a working
Polish test. As I remember including the TimesCE was unexpected
for me as the docs seemed to imply that @SysInclude { latin2 }
would already select the correct character set.
Yours
Ian
@SysInclude { doc }
@SysInclude { latin2 }
@Doc @Text @Begin
{ TimesCE Base } @Font {
Polish @Language @Date @PP
Polish @Language {
" POLISH CHARACTERS "
}
}
@End @Text
- Why Lout? and how to with latin2,
Ian Carr-de Avelon <=