[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report)
From: |
Larry W. Virden, x2487 |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report) |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Mar 1998 11:54:55 -0500 |
From: Philip Webb <address@hidden>
> but whether source files obtained with \ should be treated as normal files
> & put in the cache like all the others,
Where are 'all the others' cached?
I am sitting and looking and I see nothing being cached in terms of
files. Are the 'others' you have in mind cached in memory then? The
only thing similar to 'caching' of which I was aware is the in memory
data structures parsed from the current HTML file and the files being
edited in answering news or sending emails.
--
Larry W. Virden INET: address@hidden
<URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
- LYNX-DEV Lynx 2.7.2 report, Jacob Poon, 1998/03/26
- Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 2.7.2 report, Jan Hlavacek, 1998/03/27
- LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Philip Webb, 1998/03/27
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Roger Hill, 1998/03/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Philip Webb, 1998/03/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report),
Larry W. Virden, x2487 <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Philip Webb, 1998/03/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Jan Hlavacek, 1998/03/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Philip Webb, 1998/03/29
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Jacob Poon, 1998/03/29
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), David Woolley, 1998/03/31
- Re: LYNX-DEV caching & \ (was 2.7.2 report), Jacob Poon, 1998/03/31
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 2.7.2 report, Michael Warner, 1998/03/27
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 2.7.2 report, David Woolley, 1998/03/29
Re: LYNX-DEV Lynx 2.7.2 report, Jacob Poon, 1998/03/29