[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev keeping lynx in sync with gettext
|
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
|
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev keeping lynx in sync with gettext |
|
Date: |
Fri, 5 Feb 1999 16:00:33 +0300 (MSK) |
5-Feb-99 06:31 Webmaster Jim wrote:
>> > PLEASE do not put all that debugging code in a gettext call.
>>
>> fine with me (I don't think it's worth making the debugging code i18n).
> Right! I made the decision when reviewing the whole code base for
> gettext conversion that the trace code should not be touched by language
> conversion. As I pointed out sometime, the trace should lead you to C
> code + English comments. You need to be able to read both of those well
> enough to do something useful.
Exactly! It is supposed for rather advanced people so the language should
not be a problem. Instead, I worry about some trace messages that currently
gettext'ed being duplicated from statusline like HTAlert, HTUserMsg, HTInfoMsg.
(they are of obvious meaning when looking to the trace, though).