[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev bug in comments process
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev bug in comments process |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 08:52:23 -0500 (CDT) |
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Eduardo Chappa L. wrote:
>
> > Well here is a web page where there is a series of <script> </script>
> > tags that are misunderstood by lynx. The output you see includes the
> > comments after one </script> inside a comment in the header.
>
> Read <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/appendix/notes.html#h-B.3.2.1>.
> (Well, *they* should read it.) There are better explanations out their.
> I hate this...^
> What looks like the start of a comment to you isn't really one to SGML,
> since it is within SCRIPT content.
>
> > http://www.brunching.com/features/feature-disneywarnings.html
By the way, this is apparently parsed differently with -prettysrc,
not consistent with normal parsing. Vlad, how did you manage that?
Can you correct it?
Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev patch: images & options, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev saving-options problem, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev saving-options problem, Doug Kaufman, 1999/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev saving-options problem, Philip Webb, 1999/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev saving-options problem, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev saving-options problem : why, Philip Webb, 1999/07/29
- lynx-dev bug in comments process, Eduardo Chappa L., 1999/07/29
- Re: lynx-dev bug in comments process, Klaus Weide, 1999/07/29
- Re: lynx-dev bug in comments process,
Klaus Weide <=
- Re: lynx-dev bug in comments process, Vlad Harchev, 1999/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev bug in comments process, Klaus Weide, 1999/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev bug in comments process, Vlad Harchev, 1999/07/31
- lynx-dev non-bug in non-comments (was bug in comments process), Klaus Weide, 1999/07/31
- Re: lynx-dev saving-options problem : why, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/07/29