[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary
From: |
Janina Sajka |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 15:24:46 -0400 (EDT) |
Oh, for heaven's sake. Do you really expect to be taken seriously with
If you're going to respond to me, I'd like to hear what your
qualifications are to write apps for blind people. Answer that first,
please.
The rest, well ... there's an old proverb about no answer also being an
answer.
Janina Sajka, Director
Information Systems Research & Development
American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)
address@hidden
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 01:38 PM 10/5/99 -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
> >Please understand that I am misquoted in this message.
>
> I quoted your words verbatim.
>
> >This message, and previous ones here, lead me to wonder why you think you
> >are qualified to build products for blind users?
>
> Why did Richard Stallman think he was qualified to write an editor
> or compiler?
>
> Again, I now see that the malice we've encountered here is reflective of
> the entire GPL community, which has as its primary aim the destruction of
> markets and of programmers' livelihoods. It's a shame that Lynx fell into
> the hands of this malevolent group.
>
> --Brett Glass
>
>
- lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Brett Glass, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Gene Collins, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Brett Glass, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Gene Collins, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Brett Glass, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Gene Collins, 1999/10/06
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, mattack, 1999/10/06
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Frederic L . W . Meunier, 1999/10/06