[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)
From: |
Christof Petig |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?) |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:37:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) |
Markus Schiltknecht schrieb:
>> cvssync2 adds a file (called .mtn-sync-cvs which contains (more than) a
>> table of ( revision[/keyword_substitution] path file_id ) per revision
>> to store that information (easily delta encoded and distributed this
>> way)).*
>>
>> I would be happy to have any rcs_revision information available from a
>> cvs_import!
>
> Yes, adding ( RCS-Revision, file_path ) per revision to a cert would be
> great. I don't think file_id should be in there again.
That was added for cvssync to recognize a locally* changed file (like
what cvs does with timestamps). Of course that is unnecessary for
anything else.
*) locally means within a monotone network - to the cvs server this
looks like a single client
>> Perhaps storing that information and building a
>> map<pair<path,rcs_revision>,list<revision_id> > from all known revisions
>> to determine the branch point is a good idea. Since searching branch
>> roots should be a seldom operation performance is not critical and you
>> should be able to build the table afterwards.
>
> Hm.. I don't really get my mind around that map, currently. However, I
> don't only need to get the branch root, but I also have to be able to
> determine the order of the file revisions by RCS version (instead of the
> date, as it is done now).
This map was intended to solve the branch rooting problem, it cannot
help to construct revisions from rcs information. Actually finding a
root would mean to intersect ("Schnittmenge") the lists for every
pair<path,revision> of the branch point (likely the revision number
minus the last to numbers).
If the intersection is empty the branch point is not a valid revision
and the branch cannot be rooted. (You can create a situation like this
by moving a tag for a single file and creating the branch starting from
this tag.)
> But maybe that can be done before, correcting the date. And this is also
> irrelevant for later resyncs...
I also use a map<modified_timestamp>, vector<pair<path,rcs_revision> > >
to construct the revision tree. That is the most naive solution which I
plan to replace by something else once problems arise (for me they
didn't yet).
modified_timestamp means: try to group matching changelogs (within a
given time period) and split at differing changelogs. Newer cvs
revisions have a checkin id! I see some on my ubuntu edgy (unstable)
machine.
Christof
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Monotone-devel] big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/23
- [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Lapo Luchini, 2006/08/23
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/23
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/24
- cvs branch reconstruction (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?),
Christof Petig <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/25
- [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Lapo Luchini, 2006/08/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Christof Petig, 2006/08/28
- cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/28
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Christof Petig, 2006/08/28
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Daniel Carosone, 2006/08/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/08/28