[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty)
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty) |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:16:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Derek Scherger <address@hidden> writes:
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
[...]
>> * more notes on DNS stuff (address@hidden)
>> | 8517a0622bbe in org.vorpus.chryn
[...]
> perhaps revid/date/key/branch but that might be getting a bit long
Taking the example above:
8517a0622bbe/2006-09-10/address@hidden/org.vorpus.chryn
doesn't look that much longer than
8517a0622bbe in org.vorpus.chryn
Well, it is significantly longer, I guess, but still quite appropriate
compared to the likely first line of the changelog, IMHO. (Obviously
you'd throw in a tag if there is one. And that's author rather than
key---my guess is author makes more sense in any case.)
[...]
- [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Derek Scherger, 2006/09/14
- [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty),
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Justin Patrin, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Rob Schoening, 2006/09/14
- [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Koen Kooi, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Rob Schoening, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Rob Schoening, 2006/09/15
- [Monotone-devel] Bugs, features and history (was Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty)), Graydon Hoare, 2006/09/15