[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty)
From: |
Koen Kooi |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty) |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 23:53:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Macintosh/20060719) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rob Schoening schreef:
> Personally, I don't tend to use external tools (TortoiseXXX, Eclipse,
> ViewXXX, Trac, whatever..). But at the same time, I do recognize that
> the majority of developers in the world rely *exclusively* on such tools.
'mtn log' and 'mtn annotate' are unusable for me since a dual opteron 244 is
just too slow
to handle a repo with 8k revs (and ~800 merges). To get around that I have a
newsreader
subscriber to an rss feed that aggregated the viewmtn rss feeds, which allows
me to search
in commit messages in realtime (Newsfire has search-as-you-type). Nathaniel
built me mtn
from mainline last week that sped up log, which means that starting from 0.30
'mtn log'
will be useable for large-ish projects.
I still think monotone is the best open-source VCS/SCM around, but I am a bit
dissapointed
at 'history digging' tools and their performance. And more recently in 'mtn
add' and 'mtn
diff' being broken by the IMO bogus restriction code. So I'm wondering, is
there a plan to
fix bugs like this, or is the plan to keep adding more features like policy
branches and
do a bug-sprint after that?
regards,
Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFCc9xMkyGM64RGpERAooDAJ4i0cqQENovALlytMHJplSUDZo2eQCfdUbQ
PVhiOXr0tmDcCRb4AmDDBl0=
=HqSR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/13
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Derek Scherger, 2006/09/14
- [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Bruce Stephens, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Justin Patrin, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Rob Schoening, 2006/09/14
- [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty),
Koen Kooi <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Rob Schoening, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/09/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Rob Schoening, 2006/09/15
- [Monotone-devel] Bugs, features and history (was Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty)), Graydon Hoare, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Bugs, features and history (was Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty)), Rob Schoening, 2006/09/15
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Bugs, features and history (was Re: pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty)), Koen Kooi, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Johan Bolmsjö, 2006/09/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] pretty pretty pictures (for some value of pretty), Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/15