[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mhbuild and long header fields
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: mhbuild and long header fields |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Aug 2023 18:20:05 -0400 |
Philipp wrote:
> I have had a quick look at fold() and just calling fold() would produce
> incorrect results. fold() just insert '\n ' after 76 characters[0]. But
> to correct fold a field you must insert a '\n' befor a whitespace.
>
> I'll try to implement a corrent fold funktion on the weekend.
>
> Philipp
>
> [0] I don't know if this is an issue in the context of ical
Good catch! Yes, RFC 5322 folding for messages and RFC 5545
folding for ical are different.
Thank you. This has bothered me for a long time.
David
- mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/08/17
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/08/18
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/08/19
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Ken Hornstein, 2023/08/19
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/08/20
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/08/23
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields,
David Levine <=
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp Takacs, 2023/08/24
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/08/25
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2023/08/25
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2023/08/25
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/08/25
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/08/26
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/08/27
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/08/27
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, David Levine, 2023/08/27
- Re: mhbuild and long header fields, Philipp, 2023/08/27