Re: [palito-dev] repair/resources

[zed]

> >> along with my [usually harsh] opinions..
> 
> I think my idea is better than yours. You did something wrong in your
> simulation because in my concept it almost always leave a wreckage due
> to armor effect.

check the code.
do your code.
do it by hand.

i am trying to help the discussion.
didnt you saw the results? perhaps it were not clear..

let me read it again, i must have let something pass

> 
> Anyway, my opinions have a license. 
> -------------------------------
> It is called "BRAINMAN License"
> -------------------------------
> In a few words, it says 'I DON'T CARE';
> Here it is:
> 
> In this license 'You' means you, whoever you are, 'I' means me -
> brainman
> 
> - I DON'T CARE!
> 
> DO NOT DO ONE THING: EXPECT ME TO DO ANYTHING

needless to say.

if you want to continue the discussion ...
i like my idea, you like yours, "hell is other people", so what..
i think that the problems on the original barrett's concept were
already exposed, your solution add more variables per unit-class,
and i dont like that, it adds the the mad-unit-designer problem.

i think its just that, if its not using ...

...
wait a moment, did you read the simulation?
anyone is reading what i type?

ok, asking to much...
.. other question: do you mind if i read what you type?
(read, think about and tell you what i think?)

just dont make me review my conclusions if you didnt
even had a look at it.