[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: XLog - some impressions and feature requests (
From: |
Luc Langehegermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: XLog - some impressions and feature requests (plus release goals) |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:07:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 22:47, Stephane Fillod wrote:
>
> Instead of VFOA and VFOB, maybe RIG_VFO_TX and RIG_VFO_RX?
> These new defines will appear in Hamlib 1.1.4. Actually, they are
> already in (but not implemented everywhere), with a fodtrack backend...
>
> > Well no... an example:
> >
> > Mode: SSB
> > Uplink: 2401322500
> > Downlink: 435664500
> > Satellite: AO-40
>
> I guess you're using a transverter for the Uplink (144MHz-2.4GHz).
> And xlog may not be aware of it. So this information will have to be
> present somewhere, either in Hamlib or xlog..
>
Well... there seems to be some confusion. I don't want to directly use hamlib
with X-Log. I use the rig/hamlib with K-Track for automatic doppler
compensation and antenne turning. I 'only' want to transfer the 2
frequencies, the mode and the satellite from K-Track to X-Log.
Luc