xlog-discussion
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: XLog - some impressions and feature requests (


From: Luc Langehegermann
Subject: Re: [Xlog-discussion] Re: XLog - some impressions and feature requests (plus release goals)
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 22:07:24 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

On Tuesday 03 December 2002 22:47, Stephane Fillod wrote:
>
> Instead of VFOA and VFOB, maybe RIG_VFO_TX and RIG_VFO_RX?
> These new defines will appear in Hamlib 1.1.4. Actually, they are
> already in (but not implemented everywhere), with a fodtrack backend...
>
> > Well no... an example:
> >
> > Mode: SSB
> > Uplink: 2401322500
> > Downlink: 435664500
> > Satellite: AO-40
>
> I guess you're using a transverter for the Uplink (144MHz-2.4GHz).
> And xlog may not be aware of it. So this information will have to be
> present somewhere, either in Hamlib or xlog..
>

Well... there seems to be some confusion. I don't want to directly use hamlib 
with X-Log. I use the rig/hamlib with K-Track for automatic doppler 
compensation and antenne turning. I 'only' want to transfer the 2 
frequencies, the mode and the satellite from K-Track to X-Log.

Luc





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]