[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch

From: Mosè Giordano
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] bidi patch
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:00:45 +0200

2016-09-17 18:41 GMT+02:00 Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>:
> but what is with the issue of sending patches with
> correspond to my private branches but might include (for you) unwanted
> revsets? That is not acceptable? I should collapse them?

What do you refer to?

> [1]  I see hg facing the same fate as Xemacs, beautiful but not preferred
>      by most users....

I don't have anything against Mercurial, and you can work with hg-git
if it works well, but it doesn't seem to be so, right?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]