[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation? |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Apr 2023 17:06:01 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-334-g8c072af647-fm-20230330.001-g8c072af6 |
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023, at 3:51 PM, Bogdan wrote:
> Nice. The 0 and 1 may not be portable to each OS in the Universe
> (see EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE in exit(3)), but should be
> good/portable enough for our goals. Or maybe some other simple solution.
ISO C guarantees that exit(0) has the same effect as exit(EXIT_SUCCESS).
[It does *not*, however, guarantee that EXIT_SUCCESS == 0.]
zw
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Karl Berry, 2023/04/02
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2023/04/03
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Bogdan, 2023/04/04
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2023/04/04
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Karl Berry, 2023/04/05
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2023/04/06
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Karl Berry, 2023/04/07
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2023/04/07
- Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Karl Berry, 2023/04/08
Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?, Bogdan, 2023/04/04