Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] RFD: more avr-libc API changes

[gouy yann]

--- "Zane D. Purvis" <address@hidden> a écrit :

> Joerg Wunsch wrote:
> 
> >As Matthew MacClary wrote:
> >
> >(About whether to keep <avr/interrupt.h> or <avr/signal.h> after
> >merging their contents.)
> >
> >  
> >
> >>    My suggestion would be to change INTERRUPT to be the same as
> >>SIGNAL, and then deprecate SIGNAL.
> >>    
> >>
> How about changing the name to "ISR," which would do the same thing as 
> the existing "SIGNAL"?
> 
> 
> #include <avr/isr.h>
> 
> ISR( SIG_ADC ) {
>     // interrupt service routine code here
> }
> 
> 
> Then, SIGNAL and INTERRUPT can both be deprecated (avoiding future 
> confusion).
> 

I think this solution is by far one of the best.

   Yann


> 
> 
>              --  Zane
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
> 



        

        
                
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com