Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] RFD: more avr-libc API changes

[Royce Pereira]

Hi,
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 01:00:44 +0530, Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden>  
wrote:

> As Zane D. Purvis wrote:
>
> > How about changing the name to "ISR," which would do the same thing
> > as the existing "SIGNAL"?
>
> > Then, SIGNAL and INTERRUPT can both be deprecated (avoiding future
> > confusion).
>
> It has been suggested before, but so far, nobody else seemed to
> care about that suggestion.

In SDCC (mcs51 open source C compiler) one can name their ISR as anything,  
and then set an attribute to specify it as an ISR for a specific source.  
Like:

void zerocrossover(void) interrupt EXT0
        {
                //........      
        }
//=========================
void check_inputs(void) interrupt TF1
        {
                //..........
        }
etc...

Can this be done with AVR-GCC and what would be the problems implementing  
this?

--Royce.
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/