Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] RFD: more avr-libc API changes

[Russell Shaw]

Zane D. Purvis wrote:
> Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>
> > As Matthew MacClary wrote:
> >
> > (About whether to keep <avr/interrupt.h> or <avr/signal.h> after
> > merging their contents.)
> >
> > >    My suggestion would be to change INTERRUPT to be the same as
> > > SIGNAL, and then deprecate SIGNAL.
> > >   
>
> How about changing the name to "ISR," which would do the same thing as 
> the existing "SIGNAL"?
>
> #include <avr/isr.h>
>
> ISR( SIG_ADC ) {
>    // interrupt service routine code here
> }
>
> Then, SIGNAL and INTERRUPT can both be deprecated (avoiding future 
> confusion).

You could also use INTERRUPT_().