[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible bug
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: Possible bug |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:43:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 |
The ecrmNNNN font files are included in the tetex-base package in cygwin
but not in the tetex-tiny package which is selected automatically with
lilypond.
Still, I don't see any reason why lilypond 2.4.x should search for
the default T1 encoded computer modern fonts. I tried Bertalan's
example file here and the dvips command with $KPATHSEA_DEBUG
set to -1, it does not search for ecrm1000, only ecrm10 and the
feta fonts. I don't understand why it looks for ecrm1000 in the
cygwin version (haven't installed that package yet).
/Mats
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
Because it seems that it's not installed automatically with lilypond.
The question is: in what package should it be?
Why do you think that this is a bug?
Werner
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: address@hidden
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
- Possible bug, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/11/16
- Re: Possible bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/11/16
- Re: Possible bug, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/11/16
- Re: Possible bug,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Re: Possible bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/11/18
- Re: Possible bug, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/11/24
- Re: Possible bug, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/11/25
- Re: Possible bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/11/17