|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: Possible bug |
Date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:02:48 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 |
It should definitely not be part of the LilyPond package. One possibility is to use Werner's fix and include that in tetex-tiny. /Mats Bertalan Fodor wrote:
So, what will happen? I'd like to package 2.4.2 for cygwin... Should I put ec.mf into the lilypond package? Or should it be in the tetex-tiny package?You lost me here. I thought you found that ecrm1000 should not be looked for at all?I tried Bertalan's example file here and the dvips command with $KPATHSEA_DEBUG set to -1, it does not search for ecrm1000,I'd gladly fix the Cygwin tetex installation, but I want to be sure to make the right fix and not add another bug. Bertalan, what does Mats's command give you? Can you send a (comressed) log file to the list? Jan._______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: address@hidden WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |