[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible bug
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Possible bug |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:06:29 +0100 (CET) |
> > The TeX fallback font `ecrm1000' is only needed in TFM format,
> > since we select T1 encoding to get the proper font mapping, but
> > not a single font used in `t1cmr.fd' is accessed actually. IMHO
> > it would be fully sufficient to do
> >
> > ln -s ecrm10.tfm ecrm1000.tfm
> >
> > which doesn't do any harm.
>
> That is, as long as you don't want to use your teTeX installation to
> typeset anything else, I presume. In other words, the cygwin
> installation script could do such an ugly fix if tetex-tiny is
> installed but not tetex-base.
This is not correct. My suggested solution always works, regardless
of the used TeX distribution:
. The file ecrm10.tfm from the ec-fonts-mftraced package is
completely identical to ecrm1000.tfm if produced from the standard
EC sources.
. The search path for TFM files can contain multiple instances of
the same file without conflict; normally the first one is used.
In case the user decides to install EC fonts, it probably means
that another incarnation of ecrm1000.tfm in a different directory
is found by kpathsea (or another file searching library), but this
is completely irrelevant for TeX since the files are the same.
Werner
- Re: Possible bug, (continued)
- Re: Possible bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/11/16
- Re: Possible bug, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/11/16
- Re: Possible bug, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Werner LEMBERG, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/11/17
- Re: Possible bug, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/11/18
- Re: Possible bug, Bertalan Fodor, 2004/11/24
- Re: Possible bug, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/11/25
- Re: Possible bug,
Werner LEMBERG <=