[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FDL: wrong link in CVS?
From: |
Bernhard Voelker |
Subject: |
FDL: wrong link in CVS? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Aug 2020 18:18:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
Coming from the gnulib discussion at:
https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2020-07/msg00185.html
There is a difference for the URL in the 'FUTURE REVISIONS OF THIS LICENSE'
section of the FDL licensig text in CVS ...
https://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/gnustandards/gnustandards/fdl.texi?view=markup#l417
... and all the other different formats available (web page, plain text,
Texinfo, standalone HTML, DocBook/XML v4 or v5, LaTeX, Markdown, ODF, RTF):
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.txt
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.texi
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3-standalone.html
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.dbk
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3-db5.xml
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.tex
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.md
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.odt
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.rtf
While the version in CVS has the link to the 'copyleft' page,
all the others point to 'licenses':
-@uref{https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/}.
+@uref{https://www.gnu.org/licenses/}.
Please clarify.
FWIW also older versions have the same link:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.1.html
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.2.html
Thanks & have a nice day,
Berny
- FDL: wrong link in CVS?,
Bernhard Voelker <=